For IT & Operations Directors·GDPR-first handling·Fixed scope before cutover

Move CRM and ERP data with a GDPR-compliant, zero-loss control framework.

Start with a free 15-minute qualification conversation to review systems, data risk, and cutover readiness before choosing a fixed-price CRM or ERP migration package.

Book your free migration audit See fixed-price migration tiers

GDPR-first controls, test migrations, and a zero-loss validation plan before live cutover.

ICO-Registered UK Data Handling ProcessArticle 32 Security Controls Built Into Every Migration3-Stage Test Migration and Validation WorkflowFixed Scope Before Live Cutover12-Week Delivery Framework

Trust & Authority

A disciplined path to migration readiness

Clear business requirements, staged testing, and reconciliation checkpoints help teams approach cutover with more control.

Editorial industry context

Change choices are often constrained during migration

CIO's 24 February 2026 coverage of ISG research says 18% of surveyed large organisations implemented new SAP processes or technologies during an S/4HANA migration, while 49% made few or no changes and retained existing processes and data.

Source: CIO, “SAP migrations often fail during planning phase” (24 February 2026). This is editorial context from an SAP survey, not Flow-X performance or a prediction for a CRM or ERP project.

Editorial industry context

Budget, schedule, and quality can diverge from plan

CIO's 24 March 2025 coverage of Horváth research reported that more than 60% of surveyed S/4HANA migrations experienced deviations in budget, schedule, or result quality.

Source: CIO, “SAP customers struggle with S/4HANA migration” (24 March 2025). This is editorial context from an enterprise SAP study, not a Flow-X result, guarantee, or benchmark.

Data-quality context

Data quality deserves its own planning workstream

Gartner says poor data quality costs organisations at least $12.9m a year on average, citing its 2020 research. That is industry context—not a typical SME loss, an estimate of your organisation's exposure, or a Flow-X savings claim.

Source: Gartner, “Data Quality: Best Practices for Accurate Insights”. A scoped assessment should establish the data-quality risks and priorities relevant to an individual migration.

Trust process

Practical controls to reduce delivery uncertainty

Fixed scope, field-level mapping, test migration, reconciliation, and rollback planning create clearer checkpoints for delivery decisions; they do not remove the need for project-specific validation.

Fixed scope

Agree what moves, what changes, and who owns decisions before delivery begins to reduce uncertainty.

Field-level mapping

Document how agreed source fields map to the target model before test migration and cutover planning.

Staged test migration

Validate mappings and sample records with nominated users before production cutover.

Reconciliation

Compare agreed record categories and investigate exceptions before business sign-off.

Rollback planning

Document cutover ownership, decision points, and the rollback path in advance.

30-day support

Provide post-migration support to help resolve agreed follow-up items after handover.

Illustrative planning exampleUK professional-services CRM consolidation

A CRM consolidation planning frame

01 · Challenge

Illustrative UK professional-services firm: 180 employees and 42,000 CRM records across two sources, with duplicate contacts, consent records, and data-quality questions to resolve before cutover.

02 · Delivery plan

Agree mapping and ownership rules, complete a test migration, reconcile agreed record categories and exceptions, then use a staged cutover with a documented rollback decision path.

03 · Illustrative results

The planning aim is reviewed mappings, tested migration outputs, reconciled exceptions, cutover and rollback readiness, plus 30-day post-migration support. These are not completed-project results or a guarantee.

This is an illustrative planning frame only—not a testimonial, completed Flow-X project, achieved result, timing guarantee, or benchmark.

Delivery safeguards, clearly stated

No customer testimonials or named case studies are currently claimed. We do not present customer logos, certifications, or achieved ROI; any scenario on this page is labelled illustrative only.

ISO 27001 is an alignment statement, not a certification. Cutover timing and continuity depend on the agreed scope, systems, integrations, and client readiness.

UK GDPR-ready processArticle 32 security controlsICO-registered UK data handling processISO 27001 aligned — not certifiedFixed-price scope12-week delivery framework, where suitableZero-downtime cutover planningTest migration and reconciliationRollback planning30 days post-migration support

Still evaluating?

Book a free audit, then choose the right fixed-price migration tier.

Bring your CRM or ERP systems, data volume, and timeline. We'll help you assess GDPR-relevant migration considerations and decide whether to review options or move forward with a scoped fixed-price package.

Start with the audit if you need clarity; review migration options when you're ready to compare tiers.

View packages for these migrations →

ROI Calculator

What's the real cost of NOT migrating?

How many records do you have?

50k

How many staff use your CRM?

Hours wasted per week on bad data?

Your annual data waste cost:

£182,000

Our Starter migration costs £1,497. Payback in 0 weeks.

Get a Free Migration Audit

See which package fits your data volume and delivery risk.

View Packages →

Why businesses keep failing at DIY migrations

⚠️

The Problem

Manual migration nightmares

Duplicate records. Missing fields. GDPR breaches waiting to happen. Most “DIY” CRM migrations fail within 90 days.

💸

The Risk

The real cost of getting it wrong

Data loss fines under UK GDPR can reach £17.5 million. A failed migration costs 3× the original budget. Every day of delay = revenue at risk.

✅

The Solution

The 2-IC DATA SYSTEMS method

A fixed-scope 12-week framework where suitable, field-level mapping, test-then-migrate controls, reconciliation, and rollback planning. Each engagement needs project-specific validation.

If the risk is already clear, the next step is choosing the right migration package.

See Pricing →

Fixed

Price Scope

Week Delivery Framework

Art. 32

Control-Led Process

30 days

Post-Migration Support

Compare fixed-price packages

Fixed-Scope Packages

Choose the level of migration control you need

Fixed-price delivery for buyers who want scope certainty without compromising governance, accuracy, or cutover discipline.

Smaller firms

Fixed scope before any live data moves

Starter is built for contained migrations where one broken import or missed field becomes an expensive distraction.

Mid-market and enterprise-leaning teams

Governance, auditability, and delivery certainty

Growth is positioned for buyers who need sign-off points, cleaner accountability, and confidence that cutover will happen to plan.

See the full package comparison →

Our Process

How It Works

AI Assessment

Free 3-minute AI assessment of your migration complexity and risk.

Data Mapping & Scoping

Field-by-field mapping, every custom object accounted for.

Test Migration & Validation

Full test run before any live data moves.

Full Migration & Go-Live

Zero-downtime cutover with live monitoring.

Post-Migration Support

30 days included support and documentation handover.

Compare packages by scope See the full process →

Ready to migrate without the risk?

Compare fixed-price scope, delivery guarantees, and next-step options before the next price increase.

View Packages →Book Free Audit